SENSITIVE LATERAL FLOW IMMUNOASSAY OF UNDECLARED CHICKEN INGREDIENT IN MEAT PRODUCTS

1 HENDRICKSON Olga D.
Co-authors:
1 ZVEREVA Elena A. 1 ZHERDEV Anatoly V. 1 DZANTIEV Boris B.
Institution:
1 A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, odhendrick@gmail.com
Conference:
12th International Conference on Nanomaterials - Research & Application, Brno, Czech Republic, EU, October 21 - 23, 2020
Proceedings:
Proceedings 12th International Conference on Nanomaterials - Research & Application
Pages:
483-488
ISBN:
978-80-87294-98-7
ISSN:
2694-930X
Published:
28th December 2020
Proceedings of the conference were published in Web of Science and Scopus.
Metrics:
566 views / 397 downloads
Abstract

This study presents the development of the lateral flow assay (LFIA) for the determination of undeclared chicken additives in meat products. In the test system, immunoglobulins were proposed as biomarkers for species identification. A sandwich format of the LFIA based on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as nano-dispersed labels and colorimetric detection (both visual and instrumental) is used to determine immunoglobulins and, consequently, a source of meat. To achieve the highest analytical parameters, the LFIA was optimized by varying the assay conditions. A simple method of sample preparation was proposed. The developed LFIA allows distinguishing poultry (chicken, turkey) meat sources from mammalian sources within 20 min. The developed LFIA was applied to analyze meat foodstuffs and allowed revealing an adulteration with up to 0.063% (w/w) sensitivity. The proposed test system can be recommended for rapid on-site screening control of the composition and quality of meat products.

Keywords: Immunoglobulins, lateral flow immunoassay, meat adulteration, chicken additives

© This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Scroll to Top