THE GREEN SHIFT IN METALLURGY: A PATH TO SUSTAINABILITY OR ACCELERATED DEPLETION?

1 DUBEC Dominik
Co-authors:
1 BUĽKO Branislav 1 DEMETER Peter 1 KOVALČÍKOVÁ Kristína 1 ŠOLC Marek
Institution:
1 IMTECH FMMR - Technical University of Kosice, Kosice, Slovak Republic, EU, dominik.dubec@tuke.sk
Conference:
34th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Orea Congress Hotel Brno, Czech Republic, EU, May 21 - 23, 2025
Proceedings:
Proceedings 34th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials
ISBN:
978-80-88365-27-3
ISSN:
2694-9296
Licence:
CC BY 4.0
Metrics:
4 views / 3 downloads
Abstract

Decarbonization is essential – and it must begin immediately. As one of the leading global producers of CO₂, the metallurgical industry must contribute its share to mitigating the climate crisis. However, alongside the development and implementation of low- and zero-carbon technologies, we must ask a fundamental question: will the “green label” not merely create an illusion of sustainability? There is a real risk that under the banner of technological efficiency, total resource consumption will increase and industrial activity will shift toward a more sophisticated form of planetary destruction. This paper highlights the dangers of rebound effects, the neglect of planetary boundaries, and the emergence of “green” industry as a form of moral alibi. It also considers a broader context: the historical responsibility of industrialized nations, the imperative of climate justice, the geopolitical consequences of carbon policies, and the need for a systemic transformation. In conclusion, the paper calls on the academic community to actively engage in these debates, to ask uncomfortable questions, and to seek responsible answers.

Keywords: decarbonization, green steel, rebound effect, planetary boundaries, sustainable transformation

© This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Scroll to Top